Timing of genetic testing in BRCA1/2 and PALB2-Associated breast cancer: Preoperative result disclosure increases uptake of risk-reducing mastectomy and reduces unnecessary exposure to radiotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The impact of timing of genetic testing on uptake of risk reducing mastectomy (RRM) in affected female BRCA1/2 or PALB2 carriers remains an area of evolving interest, particularly with the introduction of mainstream genetic testing initiatives. METHODS: Women with stage I-III breast cancer and a confirmed germline pathogenic variant in BRCA1/2 or PALB2 between 2000 and 2023 were identified from an institutional genetics database. Uptake of RRM was evaluated according to disclosure of genetic testing results before or after index surgery for a first diagnosis of breast cancer. RESULTS: The cohort included 287 female BRCA1/2 or PALB2 carriers with a median age of 44 years (IQR, 36-52). Overall, 155 (54 %) carriers received genetic testing results before and 132 (46 %) after index breast surgery. Receipt of genetic testing results before surgery was associated with a higher rate of index bilateral mastectomy (58.7 % vs. 7.6 %, p < 0.001) and a commensurate decrease in adjuvant radiation (41.9 % vs. 74.2 %, p < 0.001). At a median follow up of 4.4 years after genetic testing, 219 (76.3 %) affected carriers had undergone bilateral RRM, including 83.9 % with preoperative knowledge and 67.4 % of patients with postoperative knowledge of their germline pathogenic variant (log rank, p < 0.001). On multivariate regression, disclosure of genetic testing results before index breast surgery was independently associated with long-term uptake of bilateral mastectomy (HR 1.69, 95 % CI 1.21-2.38). CONCLUSION: Genetic testing results delivered prior to index breast surgery increase uptake of bilateral RRM in affected BRCA1/2 and PALB2 carriers. Efforts to mainstream genetic testing would help optimize surgical decision-making.

The Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium 2023 Meeting Report.

On 15-16 June 2023, healthcare professionals and breast cancer patients and advocates from across Canada met in Toronto, Ontario, for the 2023 Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium (CBSC.). The CBSC. is a national, multidisciplinary event that occurs every 2 years with the goal of developing a personalized approach to the management of breast cancer in Canada. Experts provided state-of-the-art information to help optimally manage breast cancer patients, including etiology, prevention, diagnosis, experimental biology, and therapy of breast cancer and premalignant breast disease. The symposium also had the objectives of increasing communication and collaboration among breast cancer healthcare providers nationwide and providing a comprehensive and real-life review of the many facets of breast cancer. The sessions covered the patient voice, the top breast cancer papers from different disciplines in 2022, artificial intelligence in breast cancer, systemic therapy updates, the management of central nervous system metastases, multidisciplinary management of ductal carcinoma in situ, special populations, optimization-based individual prognostic factors, toxicity management of novel therapeutics, survivorship, and updates in surgical oncology. The key takeaways of these sessions have been summarized in this conference report.

Oncologic safety of breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with multiple ipsilateral breast cancer: A retrospective multi-institutional cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The recent ACOSOG Z11102 trial demonstrated low recurrence rates with breast conserving surgery (BCS) in women with multiple ipsilateral breast cancers (MIBC). Questions remain regarding the oncologic safety of BCS in women with MIBC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent BCS following NAC for stage I-III breast cancer from 2012 to 2021 at two academic centers. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to provide estimates for recurrence and survival outcomes. MIBC was defined as ≥2 foci of malignancy. RESULTS: A total of 544 patients were included; 29.4% (n = 160) ER+/HER2-, 17.7% (n = 96) ER+/HER2+, 18.2% (n = 99) ER-/HER2+, and 34.7% (n = 189) with ER-/HER2-disease. Overall, 80.5% (n = 438) had unifocal breast cancer while 19.5% (n = 106) had MIBC. Of patients with MIBC, 90.6% (n = 96) had multifocal and 9.4% (n = 10) had multicentric disease. Pathologic complete response was achieved in 41.1% of patients with MIBC versus 41.5% of patients with unifocal disease (p = 0.94). At a median follow-up of 55 months (IQR 32-83); 4.8% of patients in the unifocal group and 4.7% of patients in the MIBC group had had a local recurrence (p = 0.97). There was no difference in 5-year local recurrence-free survival (p = 0.92), recurrence-free survival (p = 0.06), or overall survival (p = 0.07) between the groups. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of women undergoing BCS post-NAC, there was no significant difference in in breast tumor recurrence or survival outcomes between patients with unifocal disease and those with MIBC.

Preoperative factors that predict pathologic nodal involvement in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer: selecting cT1cN0 patients for treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus upfront surgery.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to identify the preoperative predictors of pathologic nodal metastases (pN+) in cT1cN0 HER2+ breast cancer undergoing upfront surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from women with cT1-T2N0 HER2+ breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAC) or upfront surgery at our institution between 2012 and 2023. Factors associated with management strategy were evaluated, and in those undergoing upfront surgery, univariate analyses were performed to identify the clinicopathologic factors associated with nodal metastases. RESULTS: Overall, 255 women with cT1-T2N0 HER2+ breast cancer met inclusion criteria, including 170 (68.6%) upfront surgery patients and 85 (31.4%) who underwent NAC. The median age at diagnosis was 59 years (range, 27-90 years). Younger age, larger clinical tumor size, high-grade disease, ER-PR-HER2+ subtype, and year of diagnosis after 2019 were significantly associated with receipt of NAC (p < 0.05). In those undergoing upfront surgery, 25.3% were pN+ , including 32.5% of cT1cN0 tumors. Factors associated with nodal involvement included age under 50, larger clinical tumor size, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), multifocality/multicentricity, and abnormal lymph nodes on axillary ultrasound (p < 0.05). In subset analysis of cT1cN0 HER2+ cases, LVI remained the strongest predictor of pN + disease (73.3% vs. 22.6%, p < 0.001). Patients with cT1cN0 HER2+ breast cancer under 50 years had a 47.1% likelihood of pN+ disease. CONCLUSION: Patients with cT1cN0 breast cancer have a 32.5% likelihood of nodal metastases, with higher incidence with younger age, LVI, multifocality/multicentricity, and abnormal axillary ultrasound. The presence of these factors may identify the patients who would benefit from treatment with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Awareness and Candidacy for Endocrine Prevention and Risk Reducing Mastectomy in Unaffected High-Risk Women Referred for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Primary prevention of breast cancer in women at elevated risk includes several strategies such as endocrine prevention and risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM). The objective of this study was to evaluate awareness of different preventive strategies across high-risk subgroups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women referred for high risk evaluation between 2020 and 2023 completed an initial risk-assessment questionnaire that included questions around perceived lifetime risk and consideration of preventive strategies. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-squared tests were used to compare differences across different high-risk subgroups. RESULTS: 482 women with a median age of 43 years (20-79 years) met inclusion criteria; 183 (38.0%) germline pathogenic variant carriers (GPV), 90 (18.7%) with high-risk lesions (HRL) on breast biopsy, and 209 (43.4%) with strong family history (FH) without a known genetic predisposition. Most high-risk women reported that they had considered increased screening and surveillance (83.7%) and lifestyle strategies (80.6%), while fewer patients had considered RRM (39.8%) and endocrine prevention (27.0%). Prior to initial consultation, RRM was more commonly considered in GPV carriers (59.4%) relative to those with HRL (33.3%) or strong FH (26.3%, p < 0.001). Based on current guidelines, 206 (43%) patients were deemed eligible for endocrine prevention, including 80.5% with HRL and 39.0% with strong FH. Prior consideration of endocrine prevention was highest in patients with HRL and significantly lower in those with strong FH (47.2% HRL versus 31.1% GPV versus 18.7% FH, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Endocrine prevention is the least considered preventive option for high-risk women, despite eligibility in a significant proportion of those presenting with HRL or strong FH.

Surgical Decision Making in Genetically High-Risk Women: Quantifying Postoperative Complications and Long-Term Risks of Supplemental Surgery After Risk-Reducing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) helps prevent breast cancer in high-risk women but also carries a risk of unanticipated supplemental surgeries. We sought to determine the likelihood of supplemental surgeries following RRM. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of female patients with a confirmed germline pathogenic variant (GPV) in a breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA1/2, PALB2 and others) who underwent bilateral or contralateral RRM at our institution between 2006 and 2022. Supplemental surgeries were defined as any operation requiring general or local anesthesia performed outside of the initially planned procedure(s). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the 5-years cumulative incidence of supplemental surgery. RESULTS: Of 560 GPV carriers, RRMs were performed in 258 (46.1%) women. The median age of the cohort was 44 years (interquartile range 37-52 years), with 33 (12.8%) patients undergoing RRM without reconstruction and 225 (87.2%) undergoing RRM with reconstruction. Following surgery, 34 patients (13.2%) developed early (< 30 days) postoperative complications, including infection, hematoma, seroma, loss of the nipple areola complex, flap necrosis, implant exposure and/or prosthesis removal. At a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 94 (36.4%) GPV carriers underwent at least one reoperation. Participants who experienced an early postoperative complication had the highest rate of reoperation (85.3% vs. 29.0%; p < 0.001) and a significantly higher likelihood of multiple additional surgical interventions (41.2% vs. 10.7%; p < 0.001). The 5-years rate of supplemental surgery was 39.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 32.7-46.5] in the overall cohort and 31.5% (95% CI 24.9-39.3) in patients without an early postoperative complication. CONCLUSIONS: Unanticipated supplemental surgeries occur in 40% of GPV carriers following RRM and in nearly one-third of patients without early postoperative complications.

Clinical Considerations for the Integration of Adjuvant Olaparib into Practice for Early Breast Cancer: A Canadian Perspective.

With the recent Health Canada approval of olaparib for high-risk, HER2-negative early breast cancer, physicians are now facing the practical challenges of integrating olaparib into current management of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and HR-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer. This review provides perspectives on some of the challenges related to identification of olaparib candidates, with a focus on the latest guidance for germline BRCA testing and considerations regarding high-risk disease definitions. Updated treatment pathways are explored for both disease states, including other adjuvant treatment options such as pembrolizumab, capecitabine, and abemaciclib. Gaps in the current literature regarding the sequential or combined use of these adjuvant therapies are noted and future, potentially informative, studies are briefly examined.

Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points in Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Clinical Trials: NeoSTEEP.

PURPOSE: The Standardized Definitions for Efficacy End Points (STEEP) criteria, established in 2007 and updated in 2021 (STEEP 2.0), provide standardized definitions of adjuvant breast cancer (BC) end points. STEEP 2.0 identified a need to separately address end points for neoadjuvant clinical trials. The multidisciplinary NeoSTEEP working group of experts was convened to critically evaluate and align neoadjuvant BC trial end points. METHODS: The NeoSTEEP working group concentrated on neoadjuvant systemic therapy end points in clinical trials with efficacy outcomes-both pathologic and time-to-event survival end points-particularly for registrational intent. Special considerations for subtypes and therapeutic approaches, imaging, nodal staging at surgery, bilateral and multifocal diseases, correlative tissue collection, and US Food and Drug Administration regulatory considerations were contemplated. RESULTS: The working group recommends a preferred definition of pathologic complete response (pCR) as the absence of residual invasive cancer in the complete resected breast specimen and all sampled regional lymph nodes (ypT0/Tis ypN0 per AJCC staging). Residual cancer burden should be a secondary end point to facilitate future assessment of its utility. Alternative end points are needed for hormone receptor-positive disease. Time-to-event survival end point definitions should pay particular attention to the measurement starting point. Trials should include end points originating at random assignment (event-free survival and overall survival) to capture presurgery progression and deaths as events. Secondary end points adapted from STEEP 2.0, which are defined from starting at curative-intent surgery, may also be appropriate. Specification and standardization of biopsy protocols, imaging, and pathologic nodal evaluation are also crucial. CONCLUSION: End points in addition to pCR should be selected on the basis of clinical and biologic aspects of the tumor and the therapeutic agent investigated. Consistent prespecified definitions and interventions are paramount for clinically meaningful trial results and cross-trial comparison.

Predictors of nodal metastases in early stage HER2+ breast cancer: Deciding on treatment approach with neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. upfront surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate preoperative predictors of nodal metastases in patients with early-stage, HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. METHODS: The SEER Database was queried to identify women with a first diagnosis of stage I-II (T1-T2) HER2-positive breast cancer treated with upfront surgery in 2018. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify clinical characteristics independently associated with nodal involvement. RESULTS: Overall, 3333 women with stage I-II HER2+ breast cancer met inclusion criteria and were included in the study. The median age at diagnosis was 59 years (IQR, 51-69 years). Most patients underwent breast-conserving surgery (60.9%), with a median of 3 (IQR 2-4) axillary lymph nodes removed. On final pathology, 762 (22.9%) of T1-T2 HER2+ patients were node positive; 2.7% pN0[i+], 3.7% pN1mi, 15.1% pN1, and 1.4% pN2. Women less than 40 years and those between 40 and 49 years showed the highest proportion of axillary lymph node metastasis, in 33.7% and 30.7% respectively, and declining with age (p < 0.001). Patients with triple-positive breast cancer had the highest rates of nodal involvement (24.8%), compared to 20.7% ER+/PR-/HER2+ and 19.6% of HER2-enriched patients (p = 0.006). On adjusted analysis, age, biologic subtype, tumour size, and type of surgery remained independent predictors of nodal involvement. On subgroup analysis, women under age 50 with T1c HER2-enriched or triple-positive breast cancer had a 33% and 35% incidence of nodal involvement, which declined with age. CONCLUSIONS: The likelihood of pathologic nodal involvement in early-stage HER2+ breast cancer is contingent on age, ER/PR status, and tumour size.

Long-term outcomes of dual vs single HER2-directed neoadjuvant therapy in NSABP B-41.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this randomized neoadjuvant trial in operable, HER2-positive breast cancer, was to determine the efficacy on pathologic complete response (pCR) of substituting lapatinib (L) for trastuzumab (T) or adding L to T, in combination with weekly paclitaxel (WP) following AC. Results on pCR were previously reported. Here, we report data on planned secondary endpoints, recurrence-free interval (RFI) post-surgery, and overall survival (OS). METHODS: All patients received standard AC q3 weeks × 4 cycles followed by WP (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15, q28 days × 4 cycles. Concurrently with WP, patients received either T (4 mg/kg load, then 2 mg/kg) weekly until surgery, L (1250 mg) daily until surgery, or weekly T plus L (750 mg) daily until surgery. Following surgery, all patients received T to complete 52 weeks of HER2-targeted therapy. 522 of 529 randomized patients had follow-up. Median follow-up was 5.1 years. RESULTS: RFI at 4.5 years was 87.2%, 79.4% (p = 0.34; HR = 1.37; 95% CI 0.80, 2.34), and 89.4% (p = 0.37; HR = 0.70; 0.37, 1.32) for arms T, L, and TL, respectively. The corresponding five-year OS was 94.8%, 89.1% (p = 0.34; HR = 1.46; 0.68, 3.11), and 95.8% (p = 0.25; HR = 0.58; 0.22, 1.51), respectively. Patients with pCR had a much better prognosis, especially in the ER-negative cohort: RFI (HR = 0.23, p < 0.001) and OS (HR = 0.28, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although pCR, RFI, and OS were numerically better with the dual combination and less with L, the differences were not statistically significant. However, achievement of pCR again correlated with improved outcomes, especially remarkable in the ER-negative subset. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT00486668.

Margin Status and Local Recurrence in Phyllodes Tumours of the Breast: A Canadian Series.

BACKGROUND: Phyllodes tumours of the breast are rare fibroepithelial neoplasms with a propensity for recurrence. While surgical excision remains the standard of care, the optimal margin width is an area of active investigation. Recent studies have questioned the necessity for wide, local excision. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, cohort study of patients with phyllodes tumours treated at our institution between 2003 and 2021. Demographic, histopathological, and recurrence data were captured; malignant phyllodes were excluded. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify covariates associated with local recurrence. RESULTS: Of 187 patients with phyllodes tumours, 82.9% (n = 155) were classified as benign while 17.1% (n = 32) were borderline. Initial surgical margins were positive in 26.2% (n = 49), < 2 mm in 50.8% (n = 95), and ≥ 2 mm in 23% (n = 43) patients. Among patients with positive margins, 61.2% (n = 30) underwent margin revision. At a median follow-up of 2.9 years, the recurrence rate was 3.7%. On univariate analysis, only a positive margin at the time of initial surgery and not margin width was significantly associated with a higher rate of disease recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] 9.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.85-49.2), as was a size greater than 4 cm on preoperative imaging (HR 10.78, 95% CI 0.97-120.1). Revision of an initially positive margin was not significantly associated with decreased local recurrence (p = 1). CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of benign and borderline phyllodes tumours, positive resection margins and not margin width at the initial surgery were associated with a increased recurrence. Individualization of decisions regarding margin reexcision is important.

The Mutational Spectrum of Pre- and Post-Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Triple-Negative Breast Cancers.

The response of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients to pre-operative (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) is a critical factor of their outcome. To determine the effects of chemotherapy on the tumor genome and to identify mutations associated with chemoresistance and sensitivity, we performed whole exome sequencing on pre/post-chemotherapy tumors and matched lymphocytes from 26 patients. We observed great inter-tumoral heterogeneity with no gene mutated recurrently in more than four tumors besides TP53. Although the degree of response to chemotherapy in residual tumors was associated with more subclonal changes during chemotherapy, there was minimal evolution between pre/post-tumors. Indeed, gene sets enriched for mutations in pre- and post-chemotherapy tumors were very similar and reflected genes involved in the biological process of neurogenesis. Somatically mutated genes present in chemosensitive tumors included COL1A2, PRMD15, APOBEC3B, PALB2 and histone protein encoding genes, while BRCA1, ATR, ARID1A, XRCC3 and genes encoding for tubulin-associated proteins were present in the chemoresistant tumors. We also found that the mutational spectrum of post-chemotherapy tumors was more reflective of matching metastatic tumor biopsies than pre-chemotherapy samples. These findings support a portrait of modest ongoing genomic instability with respect to single-nucleotide variants induced by or selected for by chemotherapy in TNBCs.

Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Treatment Decisions and Cost in Patients with Node-Positive Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study in Quebec.

BACKGROUND: The 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score (RS) assay, "the assay", has led to a paradigm shift for patients with hormone receptor-positive, node-negative early breast cancer and is emerging as an important tool to assist physician-patient decisions in foregoing chemotherapy in node-positive patients. We wanted to better understand the impact of the RS assay in node-positive patients upon physician treatment decisions and treatment cost in Quebec, Canada. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, prospective observational trial for Estrogen/Progesterone Receptor (ER/PR)- positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer patients with 1-3 positive lymph nodes. Physicians completed a questionnaire indicating treatment choice prior to and post availability of RS results. The primary endpoint was change in the physician's recommendation for chemotherapy prior to and post assay results. Secondary endpoints included change in physician's expressed level of confidence, and changes in estimated cost of recommended treatments prior to and post assay results. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, physician recommendation for chemotherapy was reduced by an absolute 67.1% by knowledge of the RS assay result (P < .0001). Physician recommendation of chemotherapy was decreased by 75.9% for patients RS result <14 (P < .0001); and 67.5% for patients with RS result 14-25 (P < .0001). Changes in treatment recommendations were associated with an overall reduction in cost by 73.7% per patient, and after incorporating the cost of the RS test, a cost benefit of $823 CAN at 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Altogether, we established that the assay led to a two-third reduction in the use of chemotherapy, and was a cost-effective approach for hormone receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer.

Surgical Management and Contralateral Breast Cancer Risk in Women with History of Radiation Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Results from a Population-Based Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Women with history of chest irradiation for Hodgkin lymphoma are at increased risk of developing bilateral breast cancer, although contralateral breast cancer risk estimates in this population remain undefined. METHODS: We queried the SEER database for women treated with radiation therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma prior to age 30 years and were diagnosed with a subsequent breast cancer between 1990-2016. Trends in surgical management and the 5- and 10-year cumulative incidence of contralateral breast cancer were evaluated. RESULTS: The cohort included 295 women with a median age of 22 years (range 8-30 years) at Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis, and 42 years (range 22-65 years) at breast cancer diagnosis. Overall, 263 (89.2%) presented with unilateral breast cancer, while 32 (10.8%) presented with synchronous bilateral breast cancer. Breast-conserving surgery was performed in 17.3% of patients, while mastectomy was performed in 82.7%. In 263 patients presenting with unilateral breast cancer, 50 (19.0%) underwent breast-conserving surgery and 213 (81.0%) underwent mastectomy. Subgroup analysis of mastectomy patients demonstrated a 40.5% bilateral mastectomy rate. The 5-year incidence of contralateral breast cancer in women who underwent unilateral surgery was 9.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.6-15.4%], increasing to 20.2% (95% CI, 13.7-29.2%) at 10-year and 29.9% (95% CI, 20.8-41.9%) at 15-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Women with a history of prior chest radiation for Hodgkin lymphoma with a diagnosis of breast cancer have a 10-year contralateral breast cancer risk of 20%. These findings support consideration of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy during surgical decision-making for management of this high-risk patient population.

Incidence of Occult Breast Cancer in Carriers of BRCA1/2 or Other High-Penetrance Pathogenic Variants Undergoing Prophylactic Mastectomy: When is Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Indicated?

BACKGROUND: This study sought to determine the likelihood of occult malignancy during risk-reducing mastectomy in high-penetrance pathogenic variant carriers to help refine axillary staging recommendations. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing all female carriers of pathogenic variants in BRCA1/2, PALB2 or other genes who underwent prophylactic surgery at their institution between 2006 and 2021. Occult breast cancer was defined as the unanticipated presence of in situ or invasive malignancy on pathologic evaluation of prophylactic mastectomy specimens. RESULTS: Of 523 women, 243 carriers met the inclusion criteria for the study including 124 BRCA1 (51.0%), 108 BRCA2 (44.4%), and 11 PALB2, TP53, CDH1, or PTEN (4.6%) carriers. The median age was 44 years (interquartile range, 37-52 years). Overall, 128 women (52.7%) underwent bilateral prophylactic mastectomies, and 115 (47.3%) underwent contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. In the 371 mastectomies performed, 16 (4.3%) occult malignancies were diagnosed. Most of the occult malignancies were ductal carcinoma in situ (13 mastectomies, 3.5%), whereas 3 mastectomies (0.8%) contained invasive breast cancer. If Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) 1-2 or BIRADS 3 findings were reported on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the rate of occult malignancy decreased to 3.0 and 2.8%, respectively, per mastectomy. The patient-level factors associated with a likelihood of occult breast cancer greater than 10% included a history of prior breast cancer, age exceeding 60 years, and BIRADS 4 findings on preoperative imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Occult invasive malignancy was detected in less than 1% of the risk-reducing mastectomies performed for women with BRCA1/2 or PALB2 pathogenic variants. Sentinel lymph node biopsy can be safely avoided when BIRADS 1-3 findings are reported on preoperative MRI.

A Canadian national guideline on the neoadjuvant treatment of invasive breast cancer, including patient assessment, systemic therapy, and local management principles.

PURPOSE: The neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer (NABC) is a rapidly changing area that benefits from guidelines integrating evidence with expert consensus to help direct practice. This can optimize patient outcomes by ensuring the appropriate use of evolving neoadjuvant principles. METHODS: An expert panel formulated evidence-based practice recommendations spanning the entire neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment journey. These were sent for practice-based consensus across Canada using the modified Delphi methodology, through a secure online survey. Final recommendations were graded using the GRADE criteria for guidelines. The evidence was reviewed over the course of guideline development to ensure recommendations remained aligned with current relevant data. RESULTS: Response rate to the online survey was almost 30%; representation was achieved from various medical specialties from both community and academic centres in various Canadian provinces. Two rounds of consensus were required to achieve 80% or higher consensus on 59 final statements. Five additional statements were added to reflect updated evidence but not sent for consensus. CONCLUSIONS: Key highlights of this comprehensive Canadian guideline on NABC include the use of neoadjuvant therapy for early stage triple negative and HER2 positive breast cancer, with subsequent adjuvant treatments for patients with residual disease. The use of molecular signatures, other targeted adjuvant therapies, and optimal response-based local regional management remain actively evolving areas. Many statements had evolving or limited data but still achieved high consensus, demonstrating the utility of such a guideline in helping to unify practice while further evidence evolves in this important area of breast cancer management.